ted wrote:
> Tim Jackson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:08:35 -0000, MP wrote...
> > > Been using some Uniross 2300mAh Ni-MH rechargeable batteries in my Garmin
> > > Vista GPS for some time now and am looking to replace them, just wondering
> > > if to replace them with the same or is there some which are better suited to
> > > the Vista?
> >
> > I've found the Ni-MH rechargeables were fine in my Vista C. You should
> > be able to get higher capacity than 2300mAh at a reasonable price these
> > days if you shop around.
> >
> > I bought 2600mAh earlier this year, and they do last just that little
> > bit longer. Mine came from www.7dayshop.com and I notice they are
> > currently £3.79 for four, though postage would double the price if
> > you're not buying anything else at the same time.
> > <http://tinyurl.com/ke9wf>
> >
> > --
> > Tim Jackson
> > (E-Mail Removed)lid
> > (Change '.invalid' to '.com' to reply direct)
>
> I use 2700 mAh in my yellow Etrex, much better than the 2500 mAh they
> are £4 + I think £1 pp I don't know if that includes VAT from:-
>
I came across a reference to ENELOOP batteries from Sanyo the other
day. These have the advantage that their self discharge characteristic
has been tamed to the extent that the batteries are sold ready charged.
The claim is that they will only discharge by about 10% in a year.
The batteries have only very recently been put into production and
consequently are at a premium cost-wise and will be no doubt be until a
competitor finds some way of breaking the patents. The downside is
that some of their capacity is lost.
As far as these higher capacity Ni-MiH batteries you are discussing are
concerned, the self discharge rate is their heel. The higher the
capacity, the higher the self discharge.
One interesting exercise I did recently was to look at the data sheets
for ordinary alkaline batteries on the Energiser website. I was
interested in the comparative life time of batteries in a headtorch
taking around 100mA using AAA batteries. It would seem that as the
current demand rises in Alkalines, the capacity drops to the extent
that the only advantage of using alkalines in this application is that
they do not self discharge and that for short term use keeping
alkalines in the torch is preferable, but if likely to be used on a
longer trip, then a set of fully charged Ni MH batteries would outstay
the alkalines completely.
I didn't investigate the equivalent performance in low temperatures but
am I right in thinking that NI MH batteries outperform alkaline here
too?
Rob