On Jul 3, 9:07*am, BeartoothHOS <bearto...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:53:19 -0500, I BeartoothHOS wrote:
> > Are the new Montana models, when they get under a thick canopy, as good
> > at receiving signals as the Rinos, or better -- or only in a class with
> > the old Etrex Vista?
>
> * * * * I tried putting that question to Garmin support. The reply
> waffled a little, but basically sed the Montana has a more sensitive
> antenna than the Rino. I think I'll get one, probably from rei.com.
>
> --
> Beartooth Implacable, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
> What do they know of country, who only country know?
I was surprised when I turned one on inside Sportsmans Warehouse and
it locked onto 8 satellites. (metal roof with a few skylights spread
well apart.)
To be fair, I took an Oregon 550 outside along with the Montana 650t
to let them both get a good lock.
Went inside, lock on Oregon was sporadic, Montana kept going pretty
well. (used satellite screen).
Montana kept better signal levels & number of satellites while walking
around inside the store.
Screen visibility is much improved over Oregons & 62s.
one touch access of dashboard is very nice to show your choice of info.
|