"Graham." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:gcohko$gjb$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Off topic but might me of interest here.
> There are a couple of Gatso type cameras south of Burton in Kendal
> services that have appeared in the last week, one on each carriageway.
> They are both adjacent to a pole mounted 1 metre offset satellite dish.
>
> I've seen a similar dish on an M6 slip-road in the Warrington area
> but I could not see a camera from my viewpoint.
>
> Further north inside Cumbria the cameras (SPECS or maybe just
> surveillance) seem to be linked by a network of back-to back
> flat-plate aerials, like wi-fi repeaters.
> --
> Graham.
>
> %Profound_observation%
>



Thanks for the advice, why not share that info with the world at
www.pocketgpsworld.com and get yourself free membership to all the cameras!

Cheers

"Alex Barrow" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:fzYHk.71680$(E-Mail Removed).. .
>
> "Graham." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:gcohko$gjb$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Off topic but might me of interest here.
>> There are a couple of Gatso type cameras south of Burton in Kendal
>> services that have appeared in the last week, one on each carriageway.
>> They are both adjacent to a pole mounted 1 metre offset satellite dish.
>>
>> I've seen a similar dish on an M6 slip-road in the Warrington area
>> but I could not see a camera from my viewpoint.
>>
>> Further north inside Cumbria the cameras (SPECS or maybe just
>> surveillance) seem to be linked by a network of back-to back
>> flat-plate aerials, like wi-fi repeaters.
>> --
>> Graham.
>>
>> %Profound_observation%
>>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the advice, why not share that info with the world at
> www.pocketgpsworld.com and get yourself free membership to all the
> cameras!
>
> Cheers
>

I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA back.

"Slider" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:gd4r5l$j5l$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Alex Barrow" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:fzYHk.71680$(E-Mail Removed).. .
>>
>> "Graham." <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:gcohko$gjb$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> Off topic but might me of interest here.
>>> There are a couple of Gatso type cameras south of Burton in Kendal
>>> services that have appeared in the last week, one on each carriageway.
>>> They are both adjacent to a pole mounted 1 metre offset satellite dish.
>>>
>>> I've seen a similar dish on an M6 slip-road in the Warrington area
>>> but I could not see a camera from my viewpoint.
>>>
>>> Further north inside Cumbria the cameras (SPECS or maybe just
>>> surveillance) seem to be linked by a network of back-to back
>>> flat-plate aerials, like wi-fi repeaters.
>>> --
>>> Graham.
>>>
>>> %Profound_observation%
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the advice, why not share that info with the world at
>> www.pocketgpsworld.com and get yourself free membership to all the
>> cameras!
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>
> I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA back.
>
>

It depends, i dont think you get a freebe for mobile ones, they have to be
static.
You also have to be the first one to submit it.

In grahams case, they could qualify if the latter was true.

In message <ghJKk.52838$(E-Mail Removed)>, Alex Barrow
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>>
>> I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA back.
>>
>It depends, i dont think you get a freebe for mobile ones, they have to be
>static.
>You also have to be the first one to submit it.
>
>In grahams case, they could qualify if the latter was true.
>

You probably need a friend to also report the same camera as
confirmation.

--
Alan
news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com

"Alan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:2V3e5RYNq2+(E-Mail Removed)...
> In message <ghJKk.52838$(E-Mail Removed)>, Alex Barrow
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>>>
>>> I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA
>>> back.
>>>
>>It depends, i dont think you get a freebe for mobile ones, they have to
>>be
>>static.
>>You also have to be the first one to submit it.
>>
>>In grahams case, they could qualify if the latter was true.
>>
>
> You probably need a friend to also report the same camera as confirmation.
>
> --

Nope, you need a verifier to confirm your sighting.

In message <LNMKk.87107$(E-Mail Removed)>, Alex Barrow
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>
>"Alan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:2V3e5RYNq2+(E-Mail Removed)...
>> In message <ghJKk.52838$(E-Mail Removed)>, Alex Barrow
>> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote
>>>>
>>>> I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA
>>>> back.
>>>>
>>>It depends, i dont think you get a freebe for mobile ones, they have to
>>>be
>>>static.
>>>You also have to be the first one to submit it.
>>>
>>>In grahams case, they could qualify if the latter was true.
>>>
>>
>> You probably need a friend to also report the same camera as confirmation.
>>
>> --
>
>Nope, you need a verifier to confirm your sighting.
>

What's the difference? How did the verifier confirm the invisible
camera at the bottom of my street?

--
Alan
news2006 {at} amac {dot} f2s {dot} com

On 2008-10-15 14:25:56 +0100, "Slider" <(E-Mail Removed)> said:

> I submitted a new camera location (mobile one) and received sweet FA back.

I have no knowledge of your actual submission but for mobiles we need
to verify them first. if you are the first to report it then once
verified it goes live and as soon as a further independent sighting is
received you will get a lifetime subscription.

--
Darren Griffin
PocketGPSWorld - www.PocketGPSWorld.com
The Premier GPS Resource for News, Reviews and Forums