GPS Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: etrex 30 tracking - woods

 
 
macpacheco
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-27-2011, 02:19 PM
On Nov 26, 9:06*pm, Alan Browne <alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
wrote:
> 1. Began into woods tracking:
> * 10 GPS
> * *1 WAAS
> * *4 GLONASS - though, per the display 7 GLONASS were "visible". *Houses
> and tress blocked them, I supose.
> * Uncertainty 3m (and briefly 2).
>
> 2. In the woods, lost WAAS and the "D" disappeared from the signal bars
> of the GPS sats. * Uncertainty went to 4 and pretty much stayed there.
>
> * 7 - 9 GPS
> * 2 - 4 GLONASS
> * * * * WAAS occasional when in the few areas with a clear view south
>
> 3. After walking around for a bit, ended up at a good ground truth. *Put
> both GPS' there (the other is a photo position recorder - a GPS without
> a display - also recording at 1/5 s.); recorded the position after the
> Garmin had re-acquired WAAS for 15 seconds. *Uncertainty: 3 m.
>
> When I got home and uploaded the tracks and waypoints.
>
> The Garmin was off of the truth point by 7 metres. *The photo tracker
> was off by 3.
>
> Next time I go to that truth point I'll turn off GLONASS.
>
> Another _strange_ thing. *At one point the GLONASS sat bars showed "D"
> for differential. *What's that all about?
>
> Could it have been from SVN 33 (EGNOS 120 / AOR-E / W15.5°)?
>
> More on that tomorrow - I'll go look for "33" to pop up - I wasn't
> paying attention and it's not in the recording at all. *But does seem to
> indicate that EGNOS data is leaking into the unit and the GLONASS range
> is being corrected - maybe made the solution worse.
>
> --
> "I see!" said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.


Logic would suggest the "D" presence depends only on the IONO grid,
regardless of ephemeris/clock corrections availability. That would
explain why not all GPS satellites get a D, even though in North
America all GPS satellites in view should have an excellent ephemeris/
clock correction.

Minimum IONO uncertainty is 3 meters, and just outside of CONUS+Alaska
it jumps quickly to 4.5 meters and higher. Perhaps the receiver
considers GIVE of 4.5 or higher too low accuracy to give the satellite
a "D" status. That doesn't mean the IONO grid is or isn't used for
those satellites without a "D" status, just that the IONO grid isn't
good enough for a "D" status.

If you look at:
http://www.nstb.tc.faa.gov/incoming/igp_plot.png

You will see that GIVE jumps quite quickly with just 300-400 km away
from a station.

Just thinking out loud. Marcelo
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Alan Browne
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      11-27-2011, 02:58 PM
On 2011-11-27 10:19 , macpacheco wrote:
> On Nov 26, 9:06 pm, Alan Browne<alan.bro...@FreelunchVideotron.ca>
> wrote:
>> 1. Began into woods tracking:
>> 10 GPS
>> 1 WAAS
>> 4 GLONASS - though, per the display 7 GLONASS were "visible". Houses
>> and tress blocked them, I supose.
>> Uncertainty 3m (and briefly 2).
>>
>> 2. In the woods, lost WAAS and the "D" disappeared from the signal bars
>> of the GPS sats. Uncertainty went to 4 and pretty much stayed there.
>>
>> 7 - 9 GPS
>> 2 - 4 GLONASS
>> WAAS occasional when in the few areas with a clear view south
>>
>> 3. After walking around for a bit, ended up at a good ground truth. Put
>> both GPS' there (the other is a photo position recorder - a GPS without
>> a display - also recording at 1/5 s.); recorded the position after the
>> Garmin had re-acquired WAAS for 15 seconds. Uncertainty: 3 m.
>>
>> When I got home and uploaded the tracks and waypoints.
>>
>> The Garmin was off of the truth point by 7 metres. The photo tracker
>> was off by 3.
>>
>> Next time I go to that truth point I'll turn off GLONASS.
>>
>> Another _strange_ thing. At one point the GLONASS sat bars showed "D"
>> for differential. What's that all about?
>>
>> Could it have been from SVN 33 (EGNOS 120 / AOR-E / W15.5°)?
>>
>> More on that tomorrow - I'll go look for "33" to pop up - I wasn't
>> paying attention and it's not in the recording at all. But does seem to
>> indicate that EGNOS data is leaking into the unit and the GLONASS range
>> is being corrected - maybe made the solution worse.
>>
>> --
>> "I see!" said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.

>
> Logic would suggest the "D" presence depends only on the IONO grid,
> regardless of ephemeris/clock corrections availability. That would


I'm not concerned too much about WAAS. I'm interested in why I'm
getting "D" on some of the GLONASS birds. I think I saw sat 33 pop up -
it is an EGNOS bird.

More to follow on that.


--
"I see!" said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw.

 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
etrex 30 tracking Alan Browne Global Navigation Satellite Systems 0 11-25-2011 10:28 PM
Migratory Bird Tracking Ed M. Global Navigation Satellite Systems 0 07-17-2011 02:25 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22 PM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9