Public Notice, establishes deadline of 15 Aug 2011 for submitting
comments on Final Report.
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Rele...-11-1133A1.pdf

Search engine:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment_search/

In the first data entry window ("Proceeding Number: ?"), enter 11-109,
then scroll down and click on "Search for Proceedings"


Recommendation of Lightsquared (1.0 MB, 58 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690470


Final Report (7.9 MB, 318 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690471

Summary on pgs. 15-26 of Final Report. Aviation and Cellular sub-
teams conclude that operation in lower 10 MHz band would be
satisfactory. The other 5 sub-teams report interference even with
that change to the concept.


Appendices A.1 - G.1.E (7.4 MB, 220 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690472


Appendices G.2 - G.5 (5.8 MB, 187 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690473


Appendices H.1.1 - H.1.9 (8.1 MB, 117 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690474


Appendices H.1.10 - W.1 (9.4 MB, 133 pgs)
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690476


The Final Report and its appendices consist of 38.6 MB, 975 pages.

On 2011-07-01 11:14 , Ed M. wrote:
> Public Notice, establishes deadline of 15 Aug 2011 for submitting
> comments on Final Report.

Too bad the FCC can't read them.


--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.

In article <(E-Mail Removed)>,
Alan Browne <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> On 2011-07-01 11:14 , Ed M. wrote:
> > Public Notice, establishes deadline of 15 Aug 2011 for submitting
> > comments on Final Report.
>
> Too bad the FCC can't read them.

I think you got it backwards. If they *could* read them, they might very
possibly do something stupid; since they can't, they can't.

Isaac

On 2011-07-02 02:19 , isw wrote:
> In article<i66dnTWT0rhYdJDTnZ2dnUVZ_vqdnZ2d@giganews. com>,
> Alan Browne<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> On 2011-07-01 11:14 , Ed M. wrote:
>>> Public Notice, establishes deadline of 15 Aug 2011 for submitting
>>> comments on Final Report.
>>
>> Too bad the FCC can't read them.
>
> I think you got it backwards. If they *could* read them, they might very
> possibly do something stupid; since they can't, they can't.

The FCC were denied funding to examine the Lightsquared issue. They
can't do anything about it - that means even reading the submissions.

http://tinyurl.com/3w7u72g


--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.