http://science.house.gov/hearing/ful...quared-network

Government perspective testimony (one view of several):
http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...20Carlisle.pdf

In particular, L^2 testimony (guess what they think!):
http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...20Carlisle.pdf

Testimony with some graphs:
http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...08011_Pace.pdf

--
gmail originated posts filtered due to spam.

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:11:52 -0400, Alan Browne
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>
>http://science.house.gov/hearing/ful...quared-network
>
>Government perspective testimony (one view of several):
>http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...20Carlisle.pdf
>
>In particular, L^2 testimony (guess what they think!):
>http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...20Carlisle.pdf
>
>Testimony with some graphs:
>http://science.house.gov/sites/repub...08011_Pace.pdf

Licenses to transmit RF are conditional. That you do not interfere
with "other" licensed services. Otherwise, these Licenses can be
REVOKED.

Interference can take many forms, but I see an intermod signal on the
O-Scope depicted.

You get a license to drive on YOUR side of the street. When you start
crossing the middle divider, you lose the privilege.

Lg

Carlisle should be shot. Seriously...

"We find longplanned and long-authorized operations threatened because the
manufacturers of GPS devices have been building and selling receivers that
ignored rules the FCC established in 2003 and 2005 with their knowledge, and
without their opposition. Nevertheless, LightSquared is committed to working
with the Committee and the agencies to do our part in addressing a problem
we did not create, and we have already made substantial and real proposals.
The interference issue is a question of technology choice, and can be
addressed through proper design."

On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:21:08 +0200, Vincent van der Laan
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>Carlisle should be shot. Seriously...
>
>"We find longplanned and long-authorized operations threatened because the
>manufacturers of GPS devices have been building and selling receivers that
>ignored rules the FCC established in 2003 and 2005 with their knowledge, and
>without their opposition. Nevertheless, LightSquared is committed to working
>with the Committee and the agencies to do our part in addressing a problem
>we did not create, and we have already made substantial and real proposals.
>The interference issue is a question of technology choice, and can be
>addressed through proper design."
>

He is just a Corporate WHORE, in it for the money. What else do you
expect him to say? He has a Lear Jet to pay for.