Looks like comments on interference resolution should be filed on
Docket No. 11-109.
More general comments on FCC regulations related to GPS filed on
Docket No. 10-142.
Need to pick the right one when filling in the comment form at the
link provided by Sam.
The FCC notice:
http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Rele...A-12-103A1.pdf
" . . . Further, because we believe the ongoing Interference-
Resolution Process provides the most appropriate forum for considering
LightSquared’s satisfaction of the interference-resolution conditions
of the Conditional Waiver Order, we associate LightSquared’s Petition
with the docket established by the Commission for petitions for
reconsideration of the Conditional Waiver Order, IB Docket No.
11-109. To the extent the Petition raises general issues about the
regulatory status of GPS devices, these issues will be considered in
ET Docket No. 10-142."
Other sections of the public notice, with links to the referenced
documents:
"On December 20, 2011, LightSquared Inc. (LightSquared) filed a
Petition for Declaratory Ruling (Petition), requesting that the
Commission “resolve the regulatory status” of commercial Global
Positioning System (GPS) receivers, to the extent their operations may
be impaired by the ancillary terrestrial component (ATC) of
LightSquared’s licensed operations in the 1524-1559 MHz Mobile-
Satellite Service (MSS) band.1"
1:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021857391
"In reply comments filed in connection with the Public Notice,
LightSquared raised a full range of issues regarding the scope of
interference protection to which GPS receivers are entitled.6"
6:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021703273
"Separately, in the Report and Order in ET Docket No. 10-142, which
focused on the addition of terrestrial service allocations to the 2
GHz MSS band, the Commission briefly discussed the Conditional Waiver
Order and the Interference-Resolution Process.7"
7:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021649510
"The U.S. GPS Industry Council (USGIC) filed a petition for
reconsideration in that docket, requesting a statement from the
Commission that the GPS community is not required to share
responsibility for resolving interference issues with MSS ATC
providers like LightSquared.8"
8:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021690496
"LightSquared opposed the USGIC Recon Petition, raising many of the
same arguments contained in its
Petition for Declaratory Ruling.10"
10:
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/docume...?id=7021705626