GPS Forums


Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Erratic GPS recording

 
 
Terry Pinnell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-28-2010, 09:10 AM
My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.

It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?

--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mike Coon
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-28-2010, 09:52 AM
Terry Pinnell wrote:
> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of
> rain) on my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile
> 6.1) was the worst I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles,
> due to several bursts of erratic signals that went way outside the
> immediate vicinity. Like most of my walks, this included a proportion
> of lightly wooded track, but in the past that has just resulted in
> lost signals, not false ones.
>
> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort
> of behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results
> please?


Could it be due to extrapolation during signal loss? If you are walking
straight this could be accurate but if dodging and weaving it could
exaggerate this.

Mike.
--
If reply address is invalid, remove spurious "@" and substitute "plus"
where needed.


 
Reply With Quote
 
jaf
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-28-2010, 12:22 PM

"Terry Pinnell" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
> my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
> I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
> erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
> walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
> that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.
>
> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
> behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?
>
> --
> Terry, East Grinstead, UK


You got 11 miles of exercise in 8 miles, and you're complaining?


John

 
Reply With Quote
 
Wayne R.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-28-2010, 12:33 PM
The satellites themselves won't deteriorate en masse, but their
constellation for a particular place & time might be less than
optimal.

Trimble's "Planning Software" is designed to provide that sort of
insight.

<http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware.shtml>

It's been a while since I've used it - I'm not sure it can be
retroactive, but don't see why it couldn't be used that way. Try it
out.


On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 10:10:37 +0100, Terry Pinnell
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote (with clarity & insight):

>My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
>my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
>I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
>erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
>walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
>that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.
>
>It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
>satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
>behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?

 
Reply With Quote
 
willshak
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-29-2010, 08:11 PM
Terry Pinnell wrote the following:
> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of rain) on
> my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile 6.1) was the worst
> I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles, due to several bursts of
> erratic signals that went way outside the immediate vicinity. Like most of my
> walks, this included a proportion of lightly wooded track, but in the past
> that has just resulted in lost signals, not false ones.
>
> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort of
> behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results please?
>
> --
> Terry, East Grinstead, UK
>


Due to the conditions and anomalies of the British Isles, you should
never use a GPS without a brolly there.

--

Bill
In Hamptonburgh, NY
In the original Orange County. Est. 1683
To email, remove the double zeroes after @
 
Reply With Quote
 
Terry Pinnell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-30-2010, 07:23 AM
Wayne R. <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>The satellites themselves won't deteriorate en masse, but their
>constellation for a particular place & time might be less than
>optimal.
>
>Trimble's "Planning Software" is designed to provide that sort of
>insight.
>
><http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware.shtml>
>
>It's been a while since I've used it - I'm not sure it can be
>retroactive, but don't see why it couldn't be used that way. Try it
>out.


Thanks, took a look at the description but reckon it's a bit over the top for
my needs.

--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
 
Reply With Quote
 
Terry Pinnell
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
      03-30-2010, 07:26 AM
"Mike Coon" <Mike@@mjcoon.+.com> wrote:

>Terry Pinnell wrote:
>> My recorded walk yesterday (Sunday 27th March, Sussex, UK, spells of
>> rain) on my pocket computer (HPC Touch Pro 2 under Windows Mobile
>> 6.1) was the worst I've seen. An 8 mile walk became about 11 miles,
>> due to several bursts of erratic signals that went way outside the
>> immediate vicinity. Like most of my walks, this included a proportion
>> of lightly wooded track, but in the past that has just resulted in
>> lost signals, not false ones.
>>
>> It's a longshot, but before I pursue other likely causes, I wonder if
>> satellite performance can ever deteriorate enough to cause this sort
>> of behaviour? If so, then anyone else experience similar results
>> please?

>
>Could it be due to extrapolation during signal loss? If you are walking
>straight this could be accurate but if dodging and weaving it could
>exaggerate this.
>
>Mike.


Well, we did do a fair bit of stopping to study the map, as there were
sections with a surplus of paths through the woods and poor signing. But not
much more than usual.

Anyone else with any recordings of walks/drives from Sunday?

--
Terry, East Grinstead, UK
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Erratic Behavior of Nuvi MLD Garmin GPS 7 06-06-2010 03:08 PM
Erratic GPS signals Terry Pinnell Global Navigation Satellite Systems 13 04-07-2010 10:10 PM
Erratic GPS recording Terry Pinnell General GPS Discussion 6 03-30-2010 07:26 AM
Wildly erratic altitude data? Terry Pinnell Global Navigation Satellite Systems 9 08-31-2008 05:53 PM
erratic indications from Legend Cx Gordon Beaton Garmin GPS 5 09-05-2007 04:57 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:44 AM.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9